Compression: It Only Works If You Can Actually Wear It

Stockings, sleeves, wraps, Velcro, flat knit, circular knit, made-to-measure… and why the best compression garment may not simply be the strongest one.

If you have lymphoedema, chronic oedema or lipoedema, there is a very good chance somebody has talked to you about compression.

Perhaps you’ve been measured for a stocking.

Perhaps you have a sleeve.

Perhaps you’ve been bandaged.

Or perhaps there is a rather expensive compression garment currently living a very comfortable life in your drawer.

And that’s where I want to start.

Because when we talk about compression, we tend to talk about what people should wear.

I’m increasingly interested in another question:

What will somebody actually wear?

Because the most technically perfect compression garment in the world isn’t doing very much from inside a drawer.

Compression isn’t simply about squeezing

Compression therapy applies external pressure to tissues.

In lymphoedema and chronic oedema management, it can help control swelling and support the movement of fluid. It can also help maintain the reduction achieved during more intensive treatment.

But different compression systems behave differently.

Pressure matters.

So does the material.

So does stiffness.

So does containment — essentially how well the garment resists the tissues expanding back into it.

And then we add another rather important ingredient:

movement.

Where does compression fit into lymphoedema treatment?

Compression is an important part of Complete/Complex Decongestive Therapy — CDT, also commonly called DLT — Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy.

CDT isn’t one treatment.

It’s a package which can include compression, exercise and movement, skin care, education and self-management, with manual lymphatic drainage where appropriate.

Treatment is often described in two broad phases.

Phase 1 — reduction

The aim is to reduce swelling and improve the tissues.

Traditionally this may involve multilayer short-stretch/inelastic bandaging alongside movement, skin care and other components of CDT.

Phase 2 — maintenance

Once the limb has reduced and become more stable, compression garments can help maintain what has been achieved.

And this distinction matters.

Because if a limb is actively changing size, what we need from compression may be different from what we need once that limb is relatively stable.

Which brings us to the first big question.

What kind of compression?

There isn’t one.

Modern compression includes:

Circular-knit garments — often thinner, seamless and more elastic.

Flat-knit garments — generally stiffer, with greater containment and often made-to-measure.

Adjustable compression wraps — inelastic or low-stretch garments with overlapping adjustable straps.

Compression bandaging — particularly useful during intensive reduction.

Night-time compression systems — designed specifically for overnight use where clinically appropriate.

Upper-limb garments — sleeves, gloves and gauntlets.

Foot and toe compression — stockings, toe caps and foot pieces.

Breast and trunk compression.

And there are pads, liners and other accessories that can be incorporated where appropriate.

A 2025 compression framework for upper-body lymphoedema describes seven garment categories — circular knit, stiffer circular knit, flat knit, adjustable wraps, decongestive wraps, night garments and trunk garments — plus accessories including focal pads and donning/doffing aids.

That’s rather different from:

“Here’s your stocking.”

Shelf size or made-to-measure?

Some people fit beautifully into standard, ready-to-wear compression sizes.

Others don’t.

And bodies aren’t cylinders.

There are ankles, calves, knees, thighs, wrists and elbows.

There may be skin folds, shape distortion, fibrosis, disproportionate limbs or swelling concentrated in particular areas.

That’s where measuring matters.

Made-to-measure isn’t automatically better than ready-to-wear.

It is different.

A review examining circular-knit versus flat-knit compression concluded that garment selection should be based on clinical findings rather than simply the diagnosis. Limb shape, circumference differences, skin folds and swelling involving the toes or forefoot can all influence garment choice.

More recent clinical guidance similarly notes that people with stage II and many with stage III lymphoedema, irregular limb contours and lymphoedema involving areas such as the trunk, breast or genitals may particularly benefit from custom garments.

So perhaps a useful question isn’t:

“Do I need compression?”

but:

“What does my compression need to do?”

This is another area where the words can sound unnecessarily complicated.

Circular-knit garments are generally knitted as a continuous tube. They tend to be thinner and more elastic.

Flat-knit garments are produced differently, typically creating a denser, stiffer material with greater containment.

But here’s the important bit.

Flat knit isn’t automatically better.

And circular knit isn’t automatically inferior.

Expert consensus supports choosing between them according to factors including the severity of the lymphoedema and the shape of the limb.

That feels much more sensible to me.

Not:

“You have lymphoedema, therefore you need X.”

But:

What does this particular limb need?

Then there are the adjustable wraps…

This is the bit that has sent me down another rabbit hole.

You may have seen these.

They wrap around the limb and fasten using adjustable hook-and-loop straps.

Unlike a conventional stocking, they can be loosened and tightened.

And that creates an interesting possibility.

Imagine putting compression around a swollen leg.

The compression does its job.

Fluid moves.

The circumference of the leg reduces.

So what happens to the compression?

It may become looser.

And if it becomes looser…

should it be adjusted?

This is where the research gets interesting

In a prospective randomised study of people with moderate-to-severe leg lymphoedema, adjustable wraps produced a median limb-volume reduction of 3.1% after only two hours.

After 24 hours, median reduction was 10.3% with adjustable wraps compared with 5.9% with inelastic multicomponent bandaging.

People using the adjustable wraps were allowed to tighten them themselves when they felt it was necessary. The researchers considered self-readjustment an important part of the result.

Now jump forward to 2025.

A randomised controlled trial compared adjustable wraps with inelastic multilayer bandaging during intensive CDT for bilateral lower-leg lymphoedema.

The adjustable wraps were non-inferior for reducing lower-leg volume.

They were quicker to apply, were rated more comfortable and 83.3% of participants said they would continue using them. The authors concluded that adjustable wraps could offer an effective alternative and have particular potential for self-management — provided people receive appropriate training.

That’s important.

Not:

“Here you go. Put this on.”

But:

“Let me teach you how to manage this.”

How often should an adjustable wrap be tightened?

Now we reach something I don’t yet have an answer for.

I’ve recently heard discussion suggesting that during active reduction adjustable wraps might benefit from being checked considerably more frequently than the traditional once- or twice-a-day approach — potentially even around every 45 minutes.

Physiologically, I can understand the thinking.

If limb circumference is reducing, the wrap may loosen and interface pressure can change.

But I’ve gone looking for the evidence.

And I cannot currently find good published evidence supporting a universal “every 45 minutes” rule.

That doesn’t mean emerging research isn’t looking at it.

It means I’m not going to tell you it’s established evidence when I can’t substantiate it.

What the research does support is the importance of adjustment as limb volume changes.

And that leaves me with what I think is an even more interesting question:

Should we simply tell somebody when to tighten their wrap — or should we teach them how to recognise when it needs reassessing?

That’s self-management.

Fi Thought

A rule says: “Tighten this twice a day.”

Education says: “This is what we’re trying to achieve. This is how it should sit and feel. This is what may change as your swelling reduces. This is how you’ve been taught to adjust it — and these are the signs that mean you should ask for help.”

There’s quite a difference.

But are people actually wearing their compression?

This was the next rabbit hole.

A 2025 study followed 92 people with lymphoedema.

Only 39.1% met that study’s definition of adherence — wearing their compression for more than 12 hours a day.

But 78.3% were wearing garments 6–7 days per week.

That’s fascinating.

Because somebody can quite genuinely say:

“I wear my compression every day.”

while still not wearing it for the prescribed duration.

Previous studies cited by the authors reported adherence ranging from 28–69%, illustrating how much this varies according to the population and how adherence is defined.

And then something else jumped out at me.

Comfort mattered.

People who perceived their garment as comfortable were considerably more likely to meet the study’s adherence definition, although this was a relatively small observational study and the estimate was imprecise.

Which raises another question.

What if someone doesn’t hate compression?

What if they hate their compression?

Perhaps it rolls.

Perhaps it digs in.

Perhaps it’s hot.

Perhaps they can’t get it on.

Perhaps their hands aren’t strong enough.

Does appearance really matter?

I think it does.

If someone is expected to wear a garment for many hours, potentially every day, it becomes part of how they dress.

That’s not vanity.

That’s life.

Today’s compression world isn’t simply medical beige.

There are different colours, fabrics, patterns, finishes and styles.

For example, current UK ranges include flat-knit garments in multiple colours, softer fabrics and different levels of stiffness.

So here’s another question I’d like us to start asking:

Have you been shown the compression available to you — or simply the compression that was available in that particular clinic?

I don’t have good research showing how many patients know about the breadth of compression options available.

So I’m not going to claim that most people don’t.

But I think it’s a question worth asking.

This isn’t an endorsement of any particular company and it isn’t an exhaustive list.

Different NHS services and prescription arrangements provide access to different products.

But if you’ve only ever seen one compression garment, it may be useful to know that there is a much wider world out there.

Some of the established manufacturers/suppliers with UK lymphoedema ranges include:

JOBST UK — including Elvarex and Confidence flat-knit garments, Bella Lite, FarrowWrap adjustable systems, toe/hand pieces and other lymphoedema compression.

medi UK — including mediven flat-knit ranges such as cosy and mondi, with made-to-measure options, different fabric properties and multiple colours.

Juzo UK — including flat-knit lymphoedema and lipoedema compression with different textile properties and styles.

Haddenham Healthcare — a UK-based compression company whose ranges include easywrap adjustable compression, Comfiwave and Microfine.

SIGVARIS Britain — offering hosiery and lymphoedema compression including adjustable COMPREFLEX systems and upper- and lower-limb garments.

The point isn’t to go online and choose medical compression for yourself.

The point is to know that choices exist.

Then you can have a better conversation with your lymphoedema therapist, fitter or healthcare professional.

And don’t forget measuring

Compression needs to fit. That sounds obvious. But bodies change. Swelling changes. Weight changes. Tissues change. And garments themselves eventually wear.

If your compression starts slipping, rolling, digging in or suddenly feeling different, don’t automatically assume:

“Compression doesn’t work for me.”

Ask:

Has my limb changed?

Has the garment changed?

Does it still fit?

Is it still the right garment for what my tissues need now?

When was I last measured?

When was this garment replaced?

The 2025 adherence study found that people didn’t always replace garments at the recommended interval. Reasons included believing the garment was still in good condition, missed follow-up appointments and believing compression was no longer necessary because symptoms had improved.

Sometimes feeling better is evidence that management is working — not necessarily evidence that you no longer need it.

That’s an important conversation to have with your lymphoedema team.

Compression + movement

And finally, we come back to something I talk about a lot.

Movement.

Compression and movement aren’t competing treatments.

They can work together.

When muscles contract underneath compression, the changing pressures can support fluid movement and venous return.

Which means I’m far more interested in helping someone find movement they can actually do than insisting there is one magical lymphatic exercise.

Walk. Move your ankles. Strength train appropriately. Exercise in water. Cycle. Dance. Join a class.

Do whatever is appropriate for you and gets your body moving consistently.

Because the compression garment isn’t the only thing in this story.

You’re inside it.

🟢🟠🔴 The Fi Compression Traffic Light

🟢 GREEN — keep going and keep checking

Your compression feels supportive and comfortable.

It sits smoothly.

You can use it as you were taught.

Your skin remains healthy.

Your swelling is reasonably controlled.

And — importantly — you are actually wearing it.

🟠 AMBER — time for a conversation

Your garment keeps slipping or rolling.

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to put on or remove.

Your limb has changed size or shape.

Swelling seems to collect above or below it.

It has become uncomfortable.

Your adjustable wrap repeatedly becomes loose.

Your skin is becoming irritated.

Or you simply aren’t wearing it because it doesn’t work with your life.

Don’t just put it in the drawer.

Ask whether the fit, garment or compression strategy needs reviewing.

🔴 RED — get appropriate clinical advice

New or significant pain.

Marked changes in colour or temperature.

New numbness or altered sensation.

Skin damage.

Sudden unexplained swelling.

Signs of infection such as increasing redness, heat, pain, fever or feeling unwell.

Or concerns about your circulation.

Compression is a medical intervention. New symptoms deserve appropriate assessment rather than simply tightening the garment.

My final Fi Thought

Perhaps we need to stop asking:

“Are you wearing your compression?”

and start asking:

“How are you getting on with your compression?”

Those questions sound similar.

They aren’t.

The first can result in:

Yes / No.

The second might tell us:

I can’t get it on.

It’s too hot.

It rolls behind my knee.

My fingers aren’t strong enough.

My leg has got smaller.

I hate wearing beige.

I didn’t know there were other options.

I don’t understand why I’m wearing it.

I wasn’t sure whether I was allowed to adjust it.

I thought because my swelling was better I didn’t need it anymore.

And somewhere amongst those answers may be the information we actually need.

Compression isn’t simply something we put on a limb.

It’s part of a long-term relationship between the person, their tissues, their movement, their lifestyle and the condition they’re managing.

And if we want people to use it consistently, perhaps we need to make them a bigger part of choosing and understanding it.

📚 Fi’s Reading List — if you fancy following me down the rabbit hole

Medina Rodríguez et al. (2025) — Adherence to Compression Garments in Lymphedema Patients

A cross-sectional study of 92 people with lymphoedema examining garment use and factors associated with adherence. Only 39.1% met the study’s >12-hour definition of adherence, despite 78.3% wearing compression 6–7 days per week. Comfort was strongly associated with adherence.

💭 Fi thought:
Before we call somebody “non-compliant”, perhaps we should ask what’s making the treatment difficult to live with.

Reisshauer et al. (2025) — Adjustable compression wraps compared with inelastic multilayer bandaging during intensive CDT

A randomised non-inferiority trial involving people with bilateral lower-leg lymphoedema. Adjustable wraps were non-inferior for volume reduction, quicker to apply and more comfortable; 83.3% of participants said they would continue using them.

💭 Fi thought:
Self-management isn’t giving somebody a piece of equipment. It’s giving them the knowledge and confidence to use it properly.

Damstra & Partsch — adjustable wraps versus inelastic multicomponent bandaging

This prospective randomised study found measurable limb-volume reduction within two hours and greater median reduction after 24 hours with adjustable wraps. Participants could readjust the wraps themselves as necessary.

💭 Fi thought:
If the limb underneath the compression changes, shouldn’t we at least be thinking about what happens to the compression around it?

And this is the paper that makes me particularly interested in finding the source behind the emerging 45-minute readjustment discussion.

Reich-Schupke & Stücker (2019) — Round-knit or flat-knit compression garments for maintenance therapy of leg lymphoedema?

A review exploring the technical and clinical differences between flat- and circular-knit garments. Importantly, the authors argue that garment choice should reflect clinical findings rather than assuming everybody with lymphoedema requires the same construction.

💭 Fi thought:
Treat the person and the tissues in front of you — not simply the diagnostic label.

American Venous Forum/American Vein & Lymphatic Society/Society for Vascular Medicine Expert Consensus

Experts agreed that the choice between circular and flat knit should reflect severity and limb shape. Interestingly, they didn’t reach consensus that adjustable wraps should be first-line treatment for everybody. Several emphasised that the right compression system is patient-dependent.

💭 Fi thought:
There isn’t a winner here. There is an appropriate tool for an individual person at a particular point in their management.

Current compression classification work (2025)

Recent work categorises compression by garment type and by properties including pressure, stiffness and containment rather than treating all compression garments as variations of the same thing.

💭 Fi thought:
Perhaps we need to stop asking only “What compression class is it?” and understand what the fabric itself is being asked to do.

A note from Fi: This article is educational and isn’t intended to replace an individual lymphoedema or vascular assessment. Compression type and pressure need to be appropriate for the person, their circulation, their tissues and their condition. If your compression isn’t working for you, that is a reason for a conversation with the professional managing your compression — not simply a reason to abandon it.

pilatestherapyandbodywork.com